Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.
|Published (Last):||13 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||13.32 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hazrat Muawiya( R. A) Aur Tarikhi Haqaiq
It is very logical. Therefore, the issue becomes extremely grave. A riwaiat is not authentic because the rawi is shia and the same time another riwaiat by a shia rawi is authentic because it favours his opinion I hope you get my point. The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.
Dear Brother Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Thank you very much for answering me. But I’ll advise you to not rely on me and conduct your muawiga study. So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities? When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them. But the issue is that we do not have reliable and undisputed information about such incidents.
You can download and see through the chapters tareekgi to the years ranging from 30 to 65H.
They will be highly appreciated. If some Sahaba had something wrong, Allah will not ask us about that but if they were really acquitted from that, we will be held responsible in front of Allah for believing in reports transmitted through doubtful channels. Similarly, facts related to assassination of Bin Laden are also disputed. If you know Arabic, you should study the history from its original source. It is also reported in some narrations that he changed his decision once he found that a rule has already been established there.
Regards A Sister May The same procedure could be applied to historical reports as well. Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work. We also know that all such people disguised themselves in mainstream Muslims.
Hazrat Ameer Muawiya R-A
As far as I’ve studied the history, I’ve reached at the conclusion that it is not possible to settle a disputed issue based on a historical reports. This is the history and it cant be denied. When I conducted such research, I found that almost all reports containing negative information about such companions was reported by one amwer more of the five narrators mentioned above.
The book is available at the following links: It is completely wrong to compare him with culprits like Zia or Musharaf.
If someone blames our father, should we accept his accusations without any assessment? We should keep a good view Husn Zann about all the companions and leave the matter of their internal disputes of Allah. Similarly, Banu A’bbas did the same to defame the Ummayyads. Details of this procedure are available here: Since you’ve mentioned that you are not a ShiaI’ll urge you to study it with haqaiqq open mind and analyze its content critically.
Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa. Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments. Large number of narrators who reported the incidents related to the civil wars of companion’s time were biased against the companions. You can take each narration one by one and see the biographies of their narrators compiled by the scholars of Hadith.
I read the book thoroughly but I am sorry instead kuawiya making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful.
I’ll sincerely advise you to leave this matter to Allah. All other history books of subsequent periods were written based on Tabari’s work. If someone portrays a bad picture of any respected person for you e. Why should we rely on secondary sources? Therefore, there is no charge of revolt against him. Regards Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they haqsiq responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.
Questions are good for your intellectual health!!! Ameef appreciate that you study the history. The length tadeekhi ruling period is not a sign of patients. The unchallenged information could only be the one which is available to us by ” Tawatur please see the link below ” which is not sufficient to give us a complete picture of the incident.
Mohadisin have devised a great procedure to evaluate authenticity of Hadith. It is completely wrong to consider Hazrat Mu’awiya as the person who transformed Khilafat muawkya Malukiyat.
Other than that, there is nothing except theories of different people. Even we cannot reach at a decisive conclusion about events happening in our life. We should consider the following facts about these issues: Search the Website New.
Hazrat Muawiya( R. A) Aur Tarikhi Haqaiq : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
New articles and books are added this website on 1 st of each month. Why should we not do so in this case and leave the matter to Allah for such people who passed away a long time before us and we do not have reliable information available to put a charge against them. Tareekni approach of Tabari was to compile all the narrations whether authentic or not in a chronological order. In the first century, even it was mauwiya possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious.
Tabari is available on the following link.