Axel Honneth will study the long-run social consequences of the ongoing dissolution of the integrative force of contract-based work. His project will be partly. In Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (), Axel Honneth, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and at Columbia. Axel Honneth: Against Sloterdijk (Die Zeit, 24 September, ) An English translation of Peter Sloterdijk’s.

Author: Turisar Goltisida
Country: Sri Lanka
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 26 June 2009
Pages: 126
PDF File Size: 1.99 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.3 Mb
ISBN: 270-8-98755-281-8
Downloads: 11485
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akizil

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Moral Grammar of Social Conflictsthe recognition concept is derived mainly from G. But the burning question about the social antagonism of our own times was something he had yet to turn his attention to.

Axel Honneth | Department of Philosophy

The liberating chuckle that you might react to such war reificacon with on account of its breath-taking flippancy and sheer nuttiness has to be counterbalanced with the thought that were talking about the pronouncements of an intellectual much loved by the axfl, much respected politically within the public domain and richly rewarded within academe.

With Tim Madigan he co-edited Bertrand Russell: For Sloterdijk, merely repairing the existing social order is not good enough, reificaciin something as great as the misery of the ruling classes is at stake.

Unfortunately, he does not meet many rfificacin these challenges any better than Hegel did. What we learn next is that the opposite of the pride that superior beings have at their disposal in the battle for recognition is the ressentiment of those who cannot but occupy a subordinate position in the social hierarchy. Hegel was aware of these problems. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

From the start, Sloterdijks preference for essayistic philosophy was connected with the rise of a social group that had nothing but contempt for the capitalist welfare states forms of cultural expression, though without having any workable idea of its own how to shape the future politically.

What were supposed to understand here by demands for equality by and large remains vague what Sloterdijk has in mind however are both the nationalist and internationalist movements in modern history, the former having sued for social equality exclusively for their respective national populations, the latter attempting to lay claim to it for all the citizens of the globe.


At last somebody had set himself against all that argumentatively finicky, dizzyingly self-reflexive social criticism and exposed its fixation on mediocre values like equality and social justice.

To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please. You really have to take a close look several times at the implicit argument before it dawns on you what the peculiar thesis is that Sloterdijk is putting forward with such nonchalance here: And I suppose one could say that Honneth has done a good job updating Hegel.

It seems rather futile to point out at this stage of the argument that theoreticians as different as George Sorel and Barrington Moore drew attention to the key role of honour as a motive force of political movements at a much earlier date.

But for Hegel the moral principles governing his society still represented a definite advance over the past, as reason marches ever onward towards its fulfilment. Specifically, the world is coming more and more to be governed according to the demands of reason.

With a reference to Friedrich August von Hayek, the notion there gets the name real existing semi-socialist liberal fiscalism. This includes non- and mis-recognition as a basis of social and interpersonal conflict. From post-modern radio producers to ageing Goethe Institute directors, many gladly spun away at it. In advancing a Hegelian understanding of society, Honneth must confront all of the challenges that confronted Hegel himself.

Axel Honneth

These moral principles did not perfectly govern society; as well as morality, people certainly acted on the basis of selfishness, impulse, fear, and simple stupidity. Autonomia y Reconocimiento en Axel Honneth Documents. A small historical reminder suffices to see that the claims Sloterdijk develops here are plain nonsense; what we have to thank for them is a mixture of historical ignorance and theoretical chutzpah.


Axel Honneth – Documents. On the other hand, she cannot dismiss too many features of society as mere accidental deviations from its coherent set of moral principles. Somehow you feel youve already heard all this you might well honnteh youre being presented with an amalgam of Gehlen and Ernst Nolte, except that the reificadin of fascism and socialism and their common derivation from motives of ressentiment and thirst for power comes across here as showier and more slapdash.

This page was last edited on 27 Octoberat Moreover, history itself did not demonstrate a smooth process of advancement. Honnegh enthusiastically read every article demonising the politics ofthey noted with deep satisfaction reiflcacin the leading disciplines of the declining post 68 era, sociology and psychoanalysis, were finally getting their comeuppance.

On the contrary, they form different stages in the development of social ethics. Peter Stone is an assistant professor of political science at Trinity College Dublin. This story rested upon two claims. To view the concentration of economic wealth in the hands of a few was as unjust and to see yourself accordingly as morally called to act in defence of your interests, all that was necessary was a resolute application to the dominant state of affairs of a well-established principle the bourgeoisie itself also stood for.

The political slogan for this programme? Given such a bold claim, I would expect him to spend a lot of time demonstrating that the ideal of freedom does indeed underlie all our social practices. Here you ask yourself why Sloterdijk takes his detour via such a trivial psychology, when in fact the political constitutions of Western democracies positively encourage those who feel themselves at a disadvantage to make use of their well-founded claim to equal treatment before the law.

It certainly represents the state of the art in the field.

Political philosophymoral philosophy.